{"id":2454,"date":"2026-02-02T15:47:16","date_gmt":"2026-02-02T16:47:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/?p=2454"},"modified":"2026-02-04T17:45:17","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T17:45:17","slug":"a-moore-ish-law-for-marketing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/02\/a-moore-ish-law-for-marketing\/","title":{"rendered":"A \u201cMoore-ish\u201d law for marketing"},"content":{"rendered":"
A \u201cMoore-ish\u201d law for marketing<\/a> written by John Jantsch<\/a> read more at Duct Tape Marketing<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Marketing is quietly crossing a threshold.<\/p>\n Not because we can \u201cmake more content\u201d with AI.<\/p>\n Because every time the cost of thinking<\/em> drops, the amount of experimentation and personalization you can afford explodes. And that changes the shape of marketing from campaigns you launch to systems you operate.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve spent decades teaching small businesses to stop chasing shiny tactics and install a marketing system that creates clarity and consistent growth. That \u201csystem-first\u201d mindset is exactly what this moment demands, except now the system can learn faster than your team can type.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s the framing:<\/p>\n If it gets 2x cheaper, or 2x faster, to generate, quality-check, and deploy a new variation, you do more of them. Over time, that pushes marketing from campaign-centric<\/strong> (big launches, big bets) to system-centric<\/strong> (continuous learning, continuous improvement).<\/p>\n The unlock is not \u201cAI content.\u201d It\u2019s collapsed time-to-learning<\/strong>.<\/p>\n When time-to-learning collapses, the limiting factor shifts:<\/p>\n That is the big idea in one sentence:<\/p>\n Execution moves from human throughput to machine throughput, while humans move up the stack to judgment, strategy, constraints, narrative, offers, positioning, and ethics.<\/strong><\/p>\n The ability to create variations is no longer scarce. What is scarce is the ability to run clean tests, protect the brand, and decide.<\/p>\n Shorter loops mean you can improve messaging, creative, and offers continuously instead of waiting for a quarterly campaign post-mortem.<\/p>\n Most marketing teams spend more time coordinating work than creating leverage. As tools integrate into work apps, AI can draft, route, repurpose, tag, schedule, and execute multi-step workflows under human supervision.<\/p>\n The near-term change is simple to say and hard to implement:<\/p>\n Your team stops \u201cshipping one landing page\u201d or \u201cone email sequence\u201d or \u201cone ad set.\u201d<\/p>\n You ship:<\/p>\n Segmentation is still useful, but the economics are changing.<\/p>\n When personalization gets cheaper, you stop asking only:<\/p>\n And start asking:<\/p>\n If you want one practical takeaway: the \u201cunit of personalization\u201d is shifting from a persona to a moment.<\/p>\n Most marketing teams spend more time coordinating work than creating leverage:<\/p>\n As AI integrates with workplace tools, these coordination tasks can be automated or semi-automated with human checkpoints.<\/p>\n A new role emerges, especially in teams that want scale without chaos:<\/p>\n Marketing agent wrangler<\/strong> If change keeps accelerating, the safest career position is not \u201cthe fastest maker.\u201d<\/p>\n It is:<\/p>\n The person who can design the system that produces outcomes repeatedly.<\/strong><\/p>\n Here\u2019s a simple mapping.<\/p>\n These become machine-default, especially for first drafts and variant generation.<\/p>\n If you want a practical playbook that fits this Moore-ish acceleration, focus on four builds.<\/p>\n Your team needs a single source of truth that answers:<\/p>\n This is how you prevent fast nonsense.<\/p>\n AI without a truth layer produces confident randomness. AI with a truth layer produces scalable clarity.<\/p>\n A healthy pipeline looks like:<\/p>\n Brief \u2192 generate \u2192 fact-check \u2192 brand-check \u2192 legal-check (if needed) \u2192 deploy \u2192 measure \u2192 feed learnings back<\/strong><\/p>\n Notice what\u2019s missing: polish endlessly<\/em>.<\/p>\n If the system is meant to stream variants, your job is not perfection. Your job is controlled learning.<\/p>\n The question is not \u201cdid AI write it?\u201d<\/p>\n The question is:<\/p>\n Did it move the KPI while protecting the brand?<\/strong><\/p>\n This is where many teams will break. If you cannot evaluate, you cannot scale.<\/p>\n At minimum, define:<\/p>\n Train marketers to do the work that scales:<\/p>\n Many teams will run more tests, but fail to compound the learning. The habit of documenting what worked and why becomes a strategic advantage.<\/p>\n This moment does not replace strategy. It punishes teams who try to skip it.<\/p>\n Duct Tape Marketing has always been rooted in the idea that marketing is a system, not a pile of tactics, and that clarity beats chaos.<\/p>\n AI acceleration rewards that approach because:<\/p>\n Or said another way:<\/p>\n AI makes tactics cheaper. It also makes strategy more valuable.<\/strong><\/p>\n If you want to future-proof, build the machine, but lead it with principles:<\/p>\n No. The advantage is not volume. The advantage is iteration, testing loops, and faster time-to-learning. Volume without evaluation just creates more waste.<\/p>\n Scaling bad assumptions. If your truth layer is weak, you will publish confident errors, drift off-brand, and damage trust faster than ever.<\/p>\n Start simpler. Use AI to increase iteration on high-leverage assets where measurement is clear, like ads, landing pages, and email subject lines. Keep the loops tight and focus on one KPI per test.<\/p>\n Operationalize brand constraints, not just guidelines. Build templates, component rules, disallowed language lists, and a review checklist that enforces your standards.<\/p>\n Not to start. Begin with a standardized pipeline and a truth layer. Agents become valuable when you have repeatable workflows worth automating, and clear checkpoints for approvals and measurement.<\/p>\n Look for people who can design systems, run experiments, and make decisions with incomplete information. \u201cTaste plus rigor\u201d becomes a premium combination.<\/p>\n You move from broad segments to situational messaging on the same core journey. Think objection-based variants, industry-context variants, and stage-of-awareness variants, all measured and refined continuously.<\/p>\n If your AI program only measures time saved, you are still in productivity mode. The shift is tying AI-enabled workflows to business outcomes, with clear accountability for impact.<\/p>\n Next step:<\/strong> If you share your context (agency serving SMBs, in-house B2B, local service business, SaaS, ecommerce), I\u2019ll translate this into the three highest-leverage workflows to automate first, the roles to redesign, and the metrics that keep the machine honest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A \u201cMoore-ish\u201d law for marketing written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing Marketing is quietly crossing a threshold. Not because we can \u201cmake more content\u201d with AI. Because every time the cost of thinking drops, the amount of experimentation and personalization you can afford explodes. And that changes the shape of marketing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2456,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2454"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2454"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2457,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2454\/revisions\/2457"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gogetmuscle.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe \u201cMoore-ish\u201d Law of Marketing: When the Cost of Thinking Drops, Experimentation Explodes<\/h2>\n
Table of contents<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\nA \u201cMoore-ish\u201d law for marketing<\/h2>\n
When the cost per marketing experiment keeps falling, the number of experiments you can afford rises dramatically.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\nThree forces changing marketing right now<\/h2>\n
1) Cost per experiment is falling<\/h3>\n
2) Time-to-learning is collapsing<\/h3>\n
3) Coordination work is becoming automatable<\/h3>\n
\nWhat this means in the near term<\/h2>\n
1) Content shifts from assets to streams<\/h3>\n
\n
\nPositioning, proof, objections, tone rules, prohibited claims, and brand constraints.<\/li>\n
\nClaims, examples, stories, CTAs, offers, proof points, and objection-handling modules.<\/li>\n
\nA workflow that continuously produces variants, checks them, deploys them, measures performance, and feeds learnings back.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\nRole impact<\/h4>\n
\n
\nOwns voice, truth, persuasion, compliance, and performance feedback.<\/li>\n
\nBuilds templates, components, motion rules, and brand constraints.<\/li>\n
\nOwns workflow, governance, QA, and measurement loops.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n2) Personalization shifts from segments to situations<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
Role impact<\/h4>\n
\n
\nOwns triggers, decisioning, orchestration, and next-best-action paths.<\/li>\n
\nOwns data quality, identity, measurement, guardrails, and evaluation standards.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n3) Agents start eating coordination work<\/h3>\n
\n
Role impact<\/h4>\n
\nThe person who builds repeatable agent workflows, monitors outputs, tunes prompts, sets permissions, and makes sure \u201cautomated\u201d never means \u201cunaccountable.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nThe role shift: from makers to operators of systems<\/h2>\n
Roles that shrink (execution throughput)<\/h3>\n
\n
Roles that grow (judgment, leverage, trust)<\/h3>\n
\n
\nWhat to say, to whom, and why it\u2019s true.<\/li>\n
\nTaste, narrative, cohesion across channels.<\/li>\n
\nWhat to test, what to stop, what to double down on.<\/li>\n
\nPermissions, QA, brand safety, compliance, evaluation.<\/li>\n
\nTurning messy reality into usable direction.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nWhat to do right now: a near-term playbook<\/h2>\n
1) Build a truth layer<\/h3>\n
\n
2) Standardize a production pipeline<\/h3>\n
3) Create an evaluation habit<\/h3>\n
\n
4) Reskill around leverage<\/h3>\n
\n
\nHow this fits the Duct Tape Marketing system<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\nFAQs<\/h2>\n
1) Is this just about creating more content faster?<\/h3>\n
2) What is the biggest risk as experimentation gets cheaper?<\/h3>\n
3) What should small businesses do if they do not have a data science team?<\/h3>\n
4) How do we prevent brand inconsistency when AI is generating variants?<\/h3>\n
5) Do we need \u201cagents\u201d right now?<\/h3>\n
6) Which roles should we hire or promote for this shift?<\/h3>\n
7) How does personalization change first for most teams?<\/h3>\n
8) How do we know we are using AI in a way that drives growth, not just efficiency?<\/h3>\n
\n